INSPIRATION
The Met has embarked on a campaign to encourage more female officers to train in the use of guns.
Do you remember your first week at work? Clare Thomas will never forget hers. “During one of my earliest shifts, someone reported seeing a young man pass a silver-coloured handgun into a car,” she says. “We had to come up with a plan to confirm that it was a weapon, find the vehicle, intercept it and retrieve the handgun. All without anybody being hurt.”
How Thomas and her colleagues achieved this seemingly impossible task can't be revealed in precise detail - she's a member of a police armed response vehicle (ARV) team and their tactics are secret. However, imagine a thousand pairs of eyes working together to find the car, armed and unarmed teams gliding in and moving away from it as the operation progresses and then, for the five occupants, a loud and swift conclusion - a jarring halt, guns front and rear trained on them. The danger contained before you could say “Uzi”.
“I had been very nervous when we got the call - it was my first live incident - but we train over and over again for such scenarios,” says Thomas, a ponytailed 25-year-old in black fatigues and a bullet-proof vest. We meet at the Metropolitan Police's firearms training centre on the outskirts of Gravesend in Kent where, less than a year ago, she qualified as an AFO - an authorised firearms officer. In a holster at her side is a Glock 17 handgun; resting along the length of her forearm is a Heckler & Koch MP5 carbine.
“I was covering one of the passengers with my weapon while the car was searched,” continues Thomas. “It turned out there was a handgun in there and we were able to take it off the streets. Nobody got hurt and nobody was going to get hurt with that weapon. I felt such an adrenalin rush, such a sense of achievement. It was a good day's work.” Police Constable Clare Thomas (not her real name, for security reasons) is one of only a few female AFOs in the UK. Within CO19, Scotland Yard's specialist firearms command, to which Thomas is attached, there are 529 male AFOs and only 17 women. The handling of guns within police forces up and down the country has traditionally been the preserve of men.
Nobody knows why for sure (there has been no research). But policewomen have consistently been reluctant to become shooters; nor, though, have they been encouraged. Figures released to The Times show that, between 2002 and 2005, 1,083 male officers applied for firearms training within the Metropolitan Police Service compared with only 50 women. During that time, 81 men became qualified AFOs; only one woman passed. Across England and Wales, where there are 6,728 firearms officers, the Home Office does not record the male/female split, but the Met's experience is thought to be typical.
That, however, is about to change. Senior Met officers have embarked on a four-month campaign to encourage more female police officers to train for service alongside their armed male colleagues. It is too soon to tell what the outcome of all this will be, though the signs are promising; of 46 women who applied last year, four have so far been successful in this year's courses and hopes are high that this will encourage more to come forward.
But there are some inevitable questions: Why do we need more women gun cops? What makes a woman want to carry a gun? And, perhaps most important of all, are women as good as men in violent and dangerous situations?
It was not until 1966 that the Met formed a dedicated firearms department, the seed of today's CO19, after the murders of three unarmed officers who were trying to tackle a gang of armed robbers. At first the department was responsible for training officers. Today its functions allow the vast majority - about 90 per cent of the Met's 31,000 officers - to remain unarmed. The department comprises the armed response vehicle teams (precise numbers are kept under wraps), which deal with spontaneous incidents; two tactical support teams (TSTs), which provide support for planned missions and surveillance operations; and teams of specialist firearms officers (SFOs), elite weapons experts trained in everything from siege intervention and hostage rescue to boarding boats suspected of criminal involvement.
Within the Met, there are four other departments in which officers are routinely armed: CO18, which patrols Heathrow and London City airports (303 armed officers; 18 women); CO6, the Diplomatic Protection Group (750 armed officers; 20 women); and SO14 and SO1, protection for royalty and ministerial close protection (numbers secret).
Training to become an AFO is rigorous and only a few applicants are successful. First, an officer must have at least three years' service. He or she must complete an application designed to weed out candidates who are clearly unsuitable; but, contrary to popular belief, there is no hardcore psychological testing or psychometric culling. Highly qualified and experienced CO19 officers are involved in selection throughout the process and it is their on-the-job savvy that will determine who will be considered safe to work alongside them. Macho or gung ho tendencies are seriously frowned upon.
There are fitness tests, eyesight and hearing tests and 25 days of residential training courses at the centre in Gravesend. There are role-playing exercises to assess basic competence at policing situations, followed by training and testing in weapons handling, tactics and law. Finally, there are marksmanship tests on firing ranges, with pass rates of 80 per cent.
“Last year, Met armed response vehicles were called out to more than 12,000 incidents and they took some sort of action in more than 2,000 of them without shooting anybody,” says Kath White. As the inspector in charge of one of the Met's two tactical support teams, White is probably the most senior female firearms officer in the country. She is a fit and forthright 47-year-old who makes no secret of her love of working at the sharp end.
“The vast majority of incidents are resolved by good policing and negotiation,” she says. “Last year, the total number of times a firearm was discharged by all the AFOs in the service was just two. That demonstrates a great degree of skill and restraint and the importance of negotiation.” So will women be better at this than men? No, says White, the idea is not to introduce a gentle touch, as some commentators have suggested, simply a different one.
“I honestly don't think there is any specific quality that women can bring to firearms deployment. But what they can bring as individuals are their own personality and qualities. Traditionally, CO19 has been made up of white males. I think to be more effective we must try to replicate the society that we serve.”
White is regarded by her colleagues as proving that women can make it to the top in an otherwise male-dominated speciality. Passing continuing fitness tests has proved difficult for some women - and the force has no intention of lowering its standards - but in other areas White feels there is no reason why more women should not be taking up weapons.
“Emotionally, some officers have difficulty getting their head around the fact that, if you find yourself in a dangerous situation where your life or somebody else's is in danger, you will have to take action that may result in someone's death - but that consideration is the same for men and women,” she says.
“The training is designed not to find out who is the best woman or man for the job, but who is the best person, the best able to deal with situations in a safe and efficient way. When you're out there in a difficult situation and there is a suspect with a gun, you don't want someone on your team who is too ready to pull the trigger; but if you have someone who isn't prepared to pull it at the right time, then that person is a potential liability. Their sex has nothing to do with it.”
Melissa Hines, a psychology professor at Cambridge University who studies the behavioural differences between men and women, agrees with White. She says that average disparities between the sexes do exist - for example, men are generally more aggressive than women, which is why most violent criminals are male. But this is skewed when selection and training become involved. “Once you have a self-selecting sub-set, ie, women who join the police in the first place, then a specialist sub-set, those who choose to apply for firearms duties, the average differences don't apply,” says Hines. “Add to that the training that they undergo, and the sex of an individual becomes irrelevant.”
But what will make more women want to pick up a gun? For Clare Thomas and Kath White, it was a desire to progress and a love of working in a team. Both had difficulty, though, in explaining their decision to family and friends.
“I had been in confrontational situations and had found that I reacted calmly and efficiently,” says Thomas. “I thought that would be a useful skill to transfer into firearms. Plenty of my female friends thought it was a cool and exciting thing to do, but others - including some policewomen - just couldn't understand why I would want to carry a firearm. It was the same with guys. It is simply up to the individual, regardless of their sex.
“My family was particularly concerned, assuming that coming into contact with firearms would make me more vulnerable. You do have to sit down and explain the realities of the job, how thorough the training is and how great is the emphasis on safety. Since I did that, they have been hugely supportive. I was going out with a Marine at the time and he was dead against it. That made me more determined than ever. He isn't my boyfriend any more.
“I think the male partners of some women put pressure on them not to become an AFO, but on my training there was an officer whose kids had reached middle-school age and her husband said he was fine with her doing what she wanted. Until then, I had wondered if I would be an AFO after having children. Now I definitely would.”
White says AFOs are incredibly supportive of one another in the rare instances of suspects being shot. In 30 fatal shootings by police officers nationally over the past 15 years, no AFO has been convicted; some say that demonstrates court bias, others that it vindicates the actions of trained officers. Nevertheless, the threat of legal action and the prospect of post-shooting psychological trauma are everyday realities.
“In this job you have to realise that, in a worst-case scenario, you might make an honest mistake and be charged with murder,” says White. “After a shooting, the mood is closely knit and we all come together to support the officer. I have never shot anybody, but I am told that a justification kicks in, the memory of exactly why you believed it was precisely the right thing to do at the time. That sustains you.”
Chief Superintendent Bill Tillbrook, the head of CO19, says the women in his department have traditionally done a good job but more need to be encouraged to join. “It is also important, though, that people realise that, while we are actively encouraging women, we will not be lowering our standards simply to admit more,” he says. “I don't think female officers would want that.
“When you are carrying out positive action or focusing on one group like this, it is important that other officers - perhaps, say, those that may have failed once or twice - don't think anyone is getting special treatment. The women will be reaching the same standards as men.”
Thomas wouldn't have it any other way. “Since I became part of an ARV last August, we have recovered lots of firearms from houses, cars and people on the streets,” she says. “And I feel that makes a real difference.”
TIMESONLINE